A Two-Sided Discussion of Preregistration of NLP Research
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Standard
A Two-Sided Discussion of Preregistration of NLP Research. / Søgaard, Anders; Hershcovich, Daniel; de Lhoneux, Miryam.
EACL 2023 - 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2023. p. 83-93.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - A Two-Sided Discussion of Preregistration of NLP Research
AU - Søgaard, Anders
AU - Hershcovich, Daniel
AU - de Lhoneux, Miryam
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Van Miltenburg et al. (2021) suggest NLP research should adopt preregistration to prevent fishing expeditions and to promote publication of negative results. At face value, this is a very reasonable suggestion, seemingly solving many methodological problems with NLP research. We discuss pros and cons-some old, some new: a) Preregistration is challenged by the practice of retrieving hypotheses after the results are known; b) preregistration may bias NLP toward confirmatory research; c) preregistration must allow for reclassification of research as exploratory; d) preregistration may increase publication bias; e) preregistration may increase flag-planting; f) preregistration may increase p-hacking; and finally, g) preregistration may make us less risk tolerant. We cast our discussion as a dialogue, presenting both sides of the debate.
AB - Van Miltenburg et al. (2021) suggest NLP research should adopt preregistration to prevent fishing expeditions and to promote publication of negative results. At face value, this is a very reasonable suggestion, seemingly solving many methodological problems with NLP research. We discuss pros and cons-some old, some new: a) Preregistration is challenged by the practice of retrieving hypotheses after the results are known; b) preregistration may bias NLP toward confirmatory research; c) preregistration must allow for reclassification of research as exploratory; d) preregistration may increase publication bias; e) preregistration may increase flag-planting; f) preregistration may increase p-hacking; and finally, g) preregistration may make us less risk tolerant. We cast our discussion as a dialogue, presenting both sides of the debate.
U2 - 10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.6
DO - 10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.6
M3 - Article in proceedings
AN - SCOPUS:85159579316
SP - 83
EP - 93
BT - EACL 2023 - 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
T2 - 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2023
Y2 - 2 May 2023 through 6 May 2023
ER -
ID: 356885601