An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF. / Chen, Shuai; Sedghi Gamechi, Zahra; Dubost, Florian; van Tulder, Gijs; de Bruijne, Marleen.

In: Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 76, 102311, 02.2022, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Chen, S, Sedghi Gamechi, Z, Dubost, F, van Tulder, G & de Bruijne, M 2022, 'An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF', Medical Image Analysis, vol. 76, 102311, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102311

APA

Chen, S., Sedghi Gamechi, Z., Dubost, F., van Tulder, G., & de Bruijne, M. (2022). An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF. Medical Image Analysis, 76, 1-12. [102311]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102311

Vancouver

Chen S, Sedghi Gamechi Z, Dubost F, van Tulder G, de Bruijne M. An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF. Medical Image Analysis. 2022 Feb;76:1-12. 102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102311

Author

Chen, Shuai ; Sedghi Gamechi, Zahra ; Dubost, Florian ; van Tulder, Gijs ; de Bruijne, Marleen. / An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF. In: Medical Image Analysis. 2022 ; Vol. 76. pp. 1-12.

Bibtex

@article{66defb93282b410693c0a73308f12aa8,
title = "An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF",
abstract = "Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are often used to improve the output of an initial segmentation model, such as a convolutional neural network (CNN). Conventional CRF approaches in medical imaging use manually defined features, such as intensity to improve appearance similarity or location to improve spatial coherence. These features work well for some tasks, but can fail for others. For example, in medical image segmentation applications where different anatomical structures can have similar intensity values, an intensity-based CRF may produce incorrect results. As an alternative, we propose Posterior-CRF, an end-to-end segmentation method that uses CNN-learned features in a CRF and optimizes the CRF and CNN parameters concurrently. We validate our method on three medical image segmentation tasks: aorta and pulmonary artery segmentation in non-contrast CT, white matter hyperintensities segmentation in multi-modal MRI, and ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in multi-modal MRI. We compare this with the state-of-the-art CNN-CRF methods. In all applications, our proposed method outperforms the existing methods in terms of Dice coefficient, average volume difference, and lesion-wise F1 score.",
author = "Shuai Chen and {Sedghi Gamechi}, Zahra and Florian Dubost and {van Tulder}, Gijs and {de Bruijne}, Marleen",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.media.2021.102311",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Medical Image Analysis",
issn = "1361-8415",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An end-to-end approach to segmentation in medical images with CNN and posterior-CRF

AU - Chen, Shuai

AU - Sedghi Gamechi, Zahra

AU - Dubost, Florian

AU - van Tulder, Gijs

AU - de Bruijne, Marleen

N1 - Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are often used to improve the output of an initial segmentation model, such as a convolutional neural network (CNN). Conventional CRF approaches in medical imaging use manually defined features, such as intensity to improve appearance similarity or location to improve spatial coherence. These features work well for some tasks, but can fail for others. For example, in medical image segmentation applications where different anatomical structures can have similar intensity values, an intensity-based CRF may produce incorrect results. As an alternative, we propose Posterior-CRF, an end-to-end segmentation method that uses CNN-learned features in a CRF and optimizes the CRF and CNN parameters concurrently. We validate our method on three medical image segmentation tasks: aorta and pulmonary artery segmentation in non-contrast CT, white matter hyperintensities segmentation in multi-modal MRI, and ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in multi-modal MRI. We compare this with the state-of-the-art CNN-CRF methods. In all applications, our proposed method outperforms the existing methods in terms of Dice coefficient, average volume difference, and lesion-wise F1 score.

AB - Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are often used to improve the output of an initial segmentation model, such as a convolutional neural network (CNN). Conventional CRF approaches in medical imaging use manually defined features, such as intensity to improve appearance similarity or location to improve spatial coherence. These features work well for some tasks, but can fail for others. For example, in medical image segmentation applications where different anatomical structures can have similar intensity values, an intensity-based CRF may produce incorrect results. As an alternative, we propose Posterior-CRF, an end-to-end segmentation method that uses CNN-learned features in a CRF and optimizes the CRF and CNN parameters concurrently. We validate our method on three medical image segmentation tasks: aorta and pulmonary artery segmentation in non-contrast CT, white matter hyperintensities segmentation in multi-modal MRI, and ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in multi-modal MRI. We compare this with the state-of-the-art CNN-CRF methods. In all applications, our proposed method outperforms the existing methods in terms of Dice coefficient, average volume difference, and lesion-wise F1 score.

U2 - 10.1016/j.media.2021.102311

DO - 10.1016/j.media.2021.102311

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34902793

VL - 76

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Medical Image Analysis

JF - Medical Image Analysis

SN - 1361-8415

M1 - 102311

ER -

ID: 290452072