Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar. / van Tulder, Gijs; de Bruijne, Marleen.

In: Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 87, 102825, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

van Tulder, G & de Bruijne, M 2023, 'Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar', Medical Image Analysis, vol. 87, 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102825

APA

van Tulder, G., & de Bruijne, M. (2023). Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar. Medical Image Analysis, 87, [102825]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102825

Vancouver

van Tulder G, de Bruijne M. Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar. Medical Image Analysis. 2023;87. 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102825

Author

van Tulder, Gijs ; de Bruijne, Marleen. / Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar. In: Medical Image Analysis. 2023 ; Vol. 87.

Bibtex

@article{2da44396343443a79b30587754313f70,
title = "Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar",
abstract = "Unsupervised domain adaptation is a popular method in medical image analysis, but it can be tricky to make it work: without labels to link the domains, domains must be matched using feature distributions. If there is no additional information, this often leaves a choice between multiple possibilities to map the data that may be equally likely but not equally correct. In this paper we explore the fundamental problems that may arise in unsupervised domain adaptation, and discuss conditions that might still make it work. Focusing on medical image analysis, we argue that images from different domains may have similar class balance, similar intensities, similar spatial structure, or similar textures. We demonstrate how these implicit conditions can affect domain adaptation performance in experiments with synthetic data, MNIST digits, and medical images. We observe that practical success of unsupervised domain adaptation relies on existing similarities in the data, and is anything but guaranteed in the general case. Understanding these implicit assumptions is a key step in identifying potential problems in domain adaptation and improving the reliability of the results.",
author = "{van Tulder}, Gijs and {de Bruijne}, Marleen",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.media.2023.102825",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
journal = "Medical Image Analysis",
issn = "1361-8415",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpaired, unsupervised domain adaptation assumes your domains are already similar

AU - van Tulder, Gijs

AU - de Bruijne, Marleen

N1 - Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Unsupervised domain adaptation is a popular method in medical image analysis, but it can be tricky to make it work: without labels to link the domains, domains must be matched using feature distributions. If there is no additional information, this often leaves a choice between multiple possibilities to map the data that may be equally likely but not equally correct. In this paper we explore the fundamental problems that may arise in unsupervised domain adaptation, and discuss conditions that might still make it work. Focusing on medical image analysis, we argue that images from different domains may have similar class balance, similar intensities, similar spatial structure, or similar textures. We demonstrate how these implicit conditions can affect domain adaptation performance in experiments with synthetic data, MNIST digits, and medical images. We observe that practical success of unsupervised domain adaptation relies on existing similarities in the data, and is anything but guaranteed in the general case. Understanding these implicit assumptions is a key step in identifying potential problems in domain adaptation and improving the reliability of the results.

AB - Unsupervised domain adaptation is a popular method in medical image analysis, but it can be tricky to make it work: without labels to link the domains, domains must be matched using feature distributions. If there is no additional information, this often leaves a choice between multiple possibilities to map the data that may be equally likely but not equally correct. In this paper we explore the fundamental problems that may arise in unsupervised domain adaptation, and discuss conditions that might still make it work. Focusing on medical image analysis, we argue that images from different domains may have similar class balance, similar intensities, similar spatial structure, or similar textures. We demonstrate how these implicit conditions can affect domain adaptation performance in experiments with synthetic data, MNIST digits, and medical images. We observe that practical success of unsupervised domain adaptation relies on existing similarities in the data, and is anything but guaranteed in the general case. Understanding these implicit assumptions is a key step in identifying potential problems in domain adaptation and improving the reliability of the results.

U2 - 10.1016/j.media.2023.102825

DO - 10.1016/j.media.2023.102825

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37116296

VL - 87

JO - Medical Image Analysis

JF - Medical Image Analysis

SN - 1361-8415

M1 - 102825

ER -

ID: 345319885