TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of computer-assisted periacetabular osteotomy using a minimally invasive approach

AU - De Raedt, Sepp

AU - Mechlenburg, Inger

AU - Stilling, Maiken

AU - Rømer, Lone

AU - Murphy, Ryan J

AU - Armand, Mehran

AU - Lepistö, Jyri

AU - de Bruijne, Marleen

AU - Søballe, Kjeld

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - BACKGROUND: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the treatment of choice for younger patients with developmental hip dysplasia. The procedure aims to normalize the joint configuration, reduce the peak-pressure, and delay the development of osteoarthritis. The procedure is technically demanding and no previous study has validated the use of computer navigation with a minimally invasive transsartorial approach.METHODS: Computer-assisted PAO was performed on ten patients. Patients underwent pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning with a standardized protocol. Preoperative preparation consisted of outlining the lunate surface and segmenting the pelvis and femur from CT data. The Biomechanical Guidance System was used intra-operatively to automatically calculate diagnostic angles and peak-pressure measurements. Manual diagnostic angle measurements were performed based on pre- and postoperative CT. Differences in angle measurements were investigated with summary statistics, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plots. The percentage postoperative change in peak-pressure was calculated.RESULTS: Intra-operative reported angle measurements show a good agreement with manual angle measurements with intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.94 and 0.98. Computer navigation reported angle measurements were significantly higher for the posterior sector angle ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and the acetabular anteversion angle ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). No significant difference was found for the center-edge ([Formula: see text]), acetabular index ([Formula: see text]), and anterior sector angle ([Formula: see text]). Peak-pressure after PAO decreased by a mean of 13% and was significantly different ([Formula: see text]).CONCLUSIONS: We found that computer navigation can reliably be used with a minimally invasive transsartorial approach PAO. Angle measurements generally agree with manual measurements and peak-pressure was shown to decrease postoperatively. With further development, the system will become a valuable tool in the operating room for both experienced and less experienced surgeons performing PAO. Further studies with a larger cohort and follow-up will allow us to investigate the association with peak-pressure and postoperative outcome and pave the way to clinical introduction.

AB - BACKGROUND: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the treatment of choice for younger patients with developmental hip dysplasia. The procedure aims to normalize the joint configuration, reduce the peak-pressure, and delay the development of osteoarthritis. The procedure is technically demanding and no previous study has validated the use of computer navigation with a minimally invasive transsartorial approach.METHODS: Computer-assisted PAO was performed on ten patients. Patients underwent pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning with a standardized protocol. Preoperative preparation consisted of outlining the lunate surface and segmenting the pelvis and femur from CT data. The Biomechanical Guidance System was used intra-operatively to automatically calculate diagnostic angles and peak-pressure measurements. Manual diagnostic angle measurements were performed based on pre- and postoperative CT. Differences in angle measurements were investigated with summary statistics, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plots. The percentage postoperative change in peak-pressure was calculated.RESULTS: Intra-operative reported angle measurements show a good agreement with manual angle measurements with intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.94 and 0.98. Computer navigation reported angle measurements were significantly higher for the posterior sector angle ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and the acetabular anteversion angle ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). No significant difference was found for the center-edge ([Formula: see text]), acetabular index ([Formula: see text]), and anterior sector angle ([Formula: see text]). Peak-pressure after PAO decreased by a mean of 13% and was significantly different ([Formula: see text]).CONCLUSIONS: We found that computer navigation can reliably be used with a minimally invasive transsartorial approach PAO. Angle measurements generally agree with manual measurements and peak-pressure was shown to decrease postoperatively. With further development, the system will become a valuable tool in the operating room for both experienced and less experienced surgeons performing PAO. Further studies with a larger cohort and follow-up will allow us to investigate the association with peak-pressure and postoperative outcome and pave the way to clinical introduction.

KW - Computer-assisted surgery

KW - Hip dysplasia

KW - Intra-operative angle measurements

KW - Surgical Navigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048048640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11548-018-1802-y

DO - 10.1007/s11548-018-1802-y

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29876786

VL - 13

SP - 2021

EP - 2028

JO - International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery

JF - International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery

SN - 1861-6410

IS - 12

ER -